Monday, November 17, 2008

Silencing Dissent

The left is busy silencing any and all Obama dissenters. After all we have to have a smooth transition and treating Obama like the left treated Bush has gone on far too long and it is time to heal a divided America. Unfortunately, Obama refuses to offer up his original "vault" copy of his birth certificate. Instead Obama decides to hide behind left wing organizations and websites to fight his citizenship test for him. FACTCHECK.ORG and Daily Kos are not disinterested parties to this simple test of citizenship. What neither of these sites tell their faithful readers is that even the State that issued the short Version of Obama's birth certificate allow this form to be used as proof of being born in Hawaii. Let me say this again, Hawaii as the issuing authority would not accept this short version BC as proof of being born in Hawaii, yet Americans are supposed to accept it as proof of being a natural born citizen.

Any Obama supporter please answer the following question:

If Obama is so innocent why is he acting so guilty?

Obama is hiding something and I believe most inquiring minds would like to know what it is. Hiding something in ones closet is blackmail material. Do we really need a President that is susceptible to blackmail?

My belief is that the long version of Obama's birth certificate will state he was born in Hawaii. It is my belief that Obama is hiding a late registration. This would prove that Obama was not born in any hospital unless it was outside the State of Hawaii. Obama would have to change his story and state he really wasn't born in hospital but rather at home with a midwife. Now on the surface this is not implausible. However, Obama would look guilty in public opinion. After vehemently denying accusations and then having to change the story would not look good and would invite further investigations. This is why Obama is hiding everything from his past. Obama refuses to show any documentation prior to 1992. Obama is the President elect with about 16 years of evidence of life. Where's the other 30 years?

Now Obama supporters have been on Real Clear Politics and my site attempting to silence dissent. I refuse to go away when there are no less than SIX (6) lawsuits pending regarding Obama's Natural Born Citizen status. Now most Obama supporters and even some judges have said that the lawsuits are based on rumor and the Plaintiff did not offer proof. But really where does the proof belong? The constitution outlines the eligibility requirements and therefore the candidate should be required to offer proof that the requirements are met.

Below is a list of the lawsuits:

Ohio- Warren County Magistrate Andrew Hasselbach denied Neal's request, saying, "The onus is upon one who challenges such public officer to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by admissible evidence – not hearsay, conclusory allegations or pure speculation."

This presents a constitutional challenge. Obama should be the one required to show proof of eligibility. He is the candidate and he alone has to meet the requirement. That this is "speculation" could easily be settled by Obama showing his vault copy of the Birth Certificate.

Connecticut- Supreme Court Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers threw out the case for lack of jurisdiction within a half hour of reviewing it.

The problem here is that the highest State court forced the issue to a US Supreme Court decision. The jurisdiction ruling is a technicality. Simply the court did not wish to get involved and pushed it to the Federal Level if the Plaintiff decides to appeal.

Washington-Superior Court Judge John Erlick dismissed the lawsuit, claiming the secretary of state does not have authority to inquire about Obama's birth certificate. He also said Marquis failed to name Obama as a party to the lawsuit.

This is another misguided judgment. The Secretary of State has a responsibility to ensure the candidates meet eligibility requirements. Failing to do so is negligent. We know Obama refuses to provide the vault copy of his BC so what did the SoS use as proof? Obama's word?

New Jersey-Justice David Souter denied Donofrio's application on Nov. 6. However, his case is still pending as an emergency stay application. Donofrio is resubmitting his request for an emergency stay of the national election results and Electoral College meeting to Justice Clarence Thomas.

This is before the Supreme Court. Someone is going to have to decide how the constitutional requirements are met. Will the Supreme Court just say the candidates word is good enough? There are questions and not enforcing the constitutional requirements would destroy the constitution. Eventually, someone is going to have to answer the eligibility requirements.

Pennsylvania- Berg filed a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct.30, to force Obama to produce his birth certificate. Justice David Souter rejected an emergency appeal on Nov. 3, for the court to halt the tabulation of the 2008 presidential election results until Obama documented his eligibility to run for office. However, Souter set a schedule for a response from Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants on or before Dec. 1.

This is another case before the Supreme Court. Justice Souter has set a schedule for a response from Obama. Is Obama just going to rest on his hands and call all these lawsuits "Garbage"? I would have to say this would not encourage the Supreme Court.

Georgia- I don't think you have standing to bring this suit," he said. "I think that the attorney general has argued the law. I think he is correct. I think you are not a lawyer.

This is an example of a judge belittling a plaintiff. It is difficult to believe a judge would say a plaintiff is not a lawyer. It should not take a lawyer to argue a point. The point is that there is a constitutional requirement and someone has to enforce it. It is the Supreme Court's job to interpret the Constitution and our Nations Laws. The Supreme Court now has to interpret what is meant by "Natural born" and lay out how a candidate has to demonstrate proof.

Now Obama supporters will not allow this to see the light of day via bigger forums. Obama supporters will do everything in their power to ensure this stays behind the scenes. Eventually it will all come out. Eventually, whatever Obama is hiding will come out. Until then I refuse to be silenced.

2 comments:

CKAinRedStateUSA said...

They cannot silence you.

They cannot silence the rest of us.

They're not strong enough or clever enough.

Fascists never are.

Remember: Illegitimi non carborundum!

Do not give up!

Anonymous said...

Factcheck.org? Doesn't anyone even read the "about us" page? Factcheck.org is funded and staffed by the Annenburg Challenge, the same "community organizing" group to which Obama "worked" with Bill Ayers. It is like the RNC having a site called truthcheck.com.