Saturday, October 25, 2008

Obama Escapes On Technicality

Barack Obama escapes a lawsuit concerning his eligibility on a technicality. A federal judge (Judge Barclay Surrick) decided that Philip Berg simply did not have standing. This dismissal had nothing to do with the merits of the case only that Berg is not the right person to bring the suit. This is eerily similar to the Supreme Court in overruling Ohio on the Republican party suit against the Ohio Secretary of State concerning ACORN and voter fraud. So yet again Obama escapes.

Obama has never been forced to show proper documentation proving he is a citizen. The short form birth certificate shown on Obama website, fact check, and Daily Kos has not been verified. In fact the belief is that in all likelihood this copy is a forgery. All three websites use this same copied and scanned document as proof. The problem is that this is not proof. It is a short form that says there is a long form on file in Hawaii. This form looks real in the scanned and copied format but no one from the three sites has seen the actual document.

The left wing believes this certificate to be real and it may be. The problem is that this is not proof of being a natural born citizen. The long form could show a few different things the would either make Obama ineligible or bring further evidence that Obama is not who he claims to be. For example, Obama supporters bring up a newspaper announcemnt dated 13 AUG 1961. This seems to add credence for Obama but it actually raises more questions. News cycle in 1961 was seven days for this print paper. The Question is why did it take 9 day to run?

Antoher argument is that way back in 1961 Obama's parents must have known he was going to run for President for this fraud to be committed. That is not true. If the assumption is that Obama was not born in the United States bringing into question Obama's citizen a Parent wishing the best for a child in all likelihood would attempt anything in an effort to have the baby receive the covetted US citizenship. This behavior happens every day in America. Fraud is committed by people everyday seeking status as an American. This could have been the motive. Obama's mother could very well have been looking out for the best interest of the child and committed a fraud.

It is my belief that the long form will show a late registration. A late registration is bad for Obama. If it was late it would be difinitive proof that Obama was not born in a Honolulu hospital as claimed. On the surface this is not a big deal. Obama could have been born in his house with a midwife or similar circumstances. But that is not what is claimed. What is claimed is that Obama was born in a hospital. Obama could release the birth records from the hospital. Atleast shown the medical records that prove he was in a hospital at birth.

America needs to demand that our government does its job. Diane Feinstein as head of the ethics panel was charged with ensuring all candidates are eligilbe under the Constitution. She has failed in her job. The FEC wiped its hands clean by saying they are not responsible. The DNC also has a responsibility to vet the eligibilty. They failed but escaped under the same technicality as Obama. This is where I believe the error is in this case. The DNC has a responsibilty and should at least be required to show the proof they used in determining eligibilty. Diane Feinstein and the ethics panel shpuld also be used. Feinstein's body is a government body that has a responsibility. All I am asking is for Feinstein to provide the documents her panel used and ensure we do not have a constitutional issue arise.

There is a problem allowing Obama to run the clock out on this issue. Some say that lawsuits will do no good until after Obama is elected because he is not ineligible until after he is elected. That is where the problem is. After the election who becomes President if Obama is found ineligible? Biden? How would that redress the problem? Biden, the DNC, and a Democratic controlled Congress would be rewarded for perpetuating a crime. These groups are complicit in this and then would be rewarded for failing America.

Obama is hiding something in his past. Obama refuses o release his vault copy of his birth certificate. Obama refuses to release college and university records. Obama is a fraud and our Pathetic Pawns are not doing their job of investigating. This needs to be resolved prior to the election. The nonesense that it can not be addressed until after the fact is ridiculous. Right now it should be mandatory to document proof. The burden of proof should be on Obama to prove he is eligible to be on a ballot. After the election the burden of proof is on the individuals to prove Obama should not have been on the ballot. This needs to be resolved while Obama has the burden of proof. Escaping on a technicality is not right. Technicalities is the same reson that William Ayers is walking the streets even though he is an admitted and unrepentent terrorist.

3 comments:

Ted said...

Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!

Anonymous said...

Well if you are going to whine about this, what about John McCain... born in Panama?

Anonymous said...

*
*
*
Should The top management of the Public listed company be responsible for the company performance, eg company nearly get wind up?
*
*
http://bailoutmovie.blogspot.com/
*
*
Are you a Partisan?

Should they give their view......? If any party did not give their views, send it to their supporter to question them....
use it as a last min topics to support your supporters on this view points...